Systems and Asylum Procedures

After the COVID-19 pandemic halted many asylum procedures throughout Europe, fresh technologies are reviving these types of systems. From lie diagnosis tools examined at the line to a system for validating documents and transcribes interviews, a wide range of systems is being applied to asylum applications. This article explores how these technologies have reshaped the ways asylum procedures will be conducted. It reveals how asylum seekers happen to be transformed into required hindered techno-users: They are asked to conform to a series of techno-bureaucratic steps also to keep up with unforeseen tiny changes in criteria and deadlines. This kind of obstructs their very own capacity to find the way these devices and to follow their right for cover.

It also displays how these kinds of technologies are embedded in refugee governance: They help in the ‘circuits of financial-humanitarianism’ that function through a whirlwind of dispersed technological requirements. These requirements increase asylum seekers’ socio-legal precarity by hindering these people from being able to view the stations of security. It further states that studies of securitization and victimization should be combined with an insight in the disciplinary mechanisms of them technologies, in which migrants will be turned into data-generating subjects who have are self-disciplined by their reliability on technology.

Drawing on Foucault’s notion of power/knowledge and comarcal know-how, the article argues that these technologies have an natural obstructiveness. There is a double result: whilst they aid to expedite the asylum procedure, they also help to make it difficult for the purpose of refugees to navigate these systems. They can be positioned in a ‘knowledge deficit’ that makes them vulnerable to bogus decisions made by non-governmental stars, and www.ascella-llc.com/counseling-services-for-students/ ill-informed and unreliable narratives about their circumstances. Moreover, they pose new risks of’machine mistakes’ which may result in erroneous or discriminatory outcomes.